[Spaceapi-devel] SpaceAPI forked at spacedirectory.org - what's the plan?
Eric Stein
toba at des.truct.org
Sat Jan 21 19:35:05 CET 2017
That's a good point. Yeah, it would be better to start over after
they've been not auto-patched this whole time. Fire at will. :(
Eric
On 01/21/2017 12:15 PM, sheila miguez wrote:
> I don't know him and all the details but I am sad that all that
> happened. I hope the ongoing work has a contributor covenant or code
> of conduct that can help next time something happens. I know it won't
> necessarily prevent things, but trust me, having anything at all can
> help when you get in a position where shit is happening.
>
> Re the VMs, I'm going to suggest we spin those down since they aren't
> being used. If they are running without getting updates they will be
> targets of opportunity.
>
> Once you need a VM we can talk to the group again.
>
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2017 12:01 PM, "Eric Stein" <toba at des.truct.org
> <mailto:toba at des.truct.org>> wrote:
>
> Out of respect for Koen's wishes, I have removed him from the
> thread. Please reply to this message if you have anything to add.
>
> Eric
>
> On 01/21/2017 05:06 AM, Koen Martens wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I originally came up with the idea of the spaceapi, and it's
> fun to see
> how so many of the early adoptors made it into something real.
>
> However, after the lies, propaganda, crap and abuse the CCC
> and Jacob
> Appelbaum directed at me, i no longer feel at home in the
> hacker-community at large. I have long since said goodbye to that
> treachorous quagmire of backstabbing bs. I've sure had some
> great times,
> and there's many in the community I miss, but on the whole the
> balance
> has tipped to the negative regarding my involvement with it all.
>
> Do whatever you want folks, just don't include me in any of
> your plans.
> Especially not if the ccc is in any way, either directly or
> indirectly,
> involved.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Koen (gmc)
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 04:02:04PM -0600, Jim Campbell wrote:
>
> I think I'm reading this as the servers that we've had
> running for a long
> while haven't been used at all? Is that right? I had
> assumed that, since
> the space api website was up, that it was using those
> servers.
> Whatever you all end up doing is fine, but those
> servers have been up for
> probably years, so I'm a bit disappointed to know that
> they haven't been
> used. Let me know what you decide to do.
> Jim
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Eric Stein
> <toba at des.truct.org <mailto:toba at des.truct.org>> wrote:
>
> Hey SpaceAPI maintainers & interested parties...
>
> Just heard from Sheila that
> https://spacedirectory.org/ is a thing
> that's happened. The announcement about
> spacedirectory.org <http://spacedirectory.org> -
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-January/011302.html
> <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-January/011302.html>.
>
> I got us some VMs from Jim a long time ago and we
> never managed to cut
> over to them due to various reasons. Do we still
> need those servers?Â
> Current SpaceAPI maintainers (Roland, Romain, Koen)
> - what do you think
> of this? I personally am hopeful that they mean
> well and we could
> merge our efforts potentially. Some of the things
> that Romain already
> wrote could potentially be usable on this new effort
> but I don't
> personally know how to set them up properly.
>
> I don't know how they intend to do governance of the
> spec / requirements
> for the new directory software.
>
> Eric Stein
>
> @toba
>
> Pumping Station: One member
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/spaceapi-devel/attachments/20170121/51deab11/attachment.html>
More information about the Spaceapi-devel
mailing list