[hackerspaces] Safe Space Policies?
Al Jigong Billings
albill at openbuddha.com
Sun Jan 26 22:14:45 CET 2014
No because you're misreading what was said. If you're group is not
disenfranchised, you don't need special support. Try again.
On Jan 26, 2014 12:02 PM, "Volatile Compound" <volatilecompound at gmail.com>
> The original quote was as follows:
> "It is not unreasonable to accomodate disenfranchised groups more than
> groups that are not."
> Note the use of the words 'more than' in the above statement. That
> implies an enforced inequality, specifically in terms of accommodating one
> group in favour of another.
> Hopefully this has helped to clarify the matter for you.
> - skroo.
> On 1/26/14, 11:33 AM, Al Billings wrote:
>> How is accommodating disenfranchising groups somehow disenfranchising
>> another group? Do explain.
>> Al Billings
>> On Sunday, January 26, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Volatile Compound wrote:
>> It is not unreasonable to accomodate disenfranchised groups more than
>>>> groups that are not.
>>> So what you're saying is that in order to un-disenfranchise one group,
>>> you're intending to disenfranchise another.
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss