[hackerspaces] Safe Space Policies?
Volatile Compound
volatilecompound at gmail.com
Sun Jan 26 21:02:16 CET 2014
The original quote was as follows:
"It is not unreasonable to accomodate disenfranchised groups more than
groups that are not."
Note the use of the words 'more than' in the above statement. That
implies an enforced inequality, specifically in terms of accommodating
one group in favour of another.
Hopefully this has helped to clarify the matter for you.
- skroo.
On 1/26/14, 11:33 AM, Al Billings wrote:
> How is accommodating disenfranchising groups somehow disenfranchising
> another group? Do explain.
>
> --
> Al Billings
> http://www.openbuddha.com
> http://makehacklearn.org
>
> On Sunday, January 26, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Volatile Compound wrote:
>
>>> It is not unreasonable to accomodate disenfranchised groups more than
>>> groups that are not.
>>
>> So what you're saying is that in order to un-disenfranchise one group,
>> you're intending to disenfranchise another.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list