[hackerspaces] New Member Vetting
matt at nycresistor.com
Tue Sep 18 01:33:27 CEST 2012
Nycresistor went with a pre proposal of a member followed by a vote. A
single dissenting vote would be enough to disallow membership.
On Sep 17, 2012 3:13 PM, "Ben Brown" <ben at generik.ca> wrote:
> We've got an interesting topic going on our own discuss list about
> strengthening membership vetting, spawning from a member's experience in
> another organization that's now considering police checks for applicants.
> Traditionally, we've had applicants show up to a few open nights before
> the board votes on their application. Members who have qualms about that
> applicant have 5 days to speak up before the application is considered.
> So far we've only rejected a single person (because they didn't attend
> enough open nights) but now thinking about it, most hackerspaces
> (including ours) entrust a significant amount of equipment to people who
> we've only had very limited contact. As we're quickly growing past our
> founding members, I'm wondering how other hackerspaces have adapted?
> A couple ideas being thrown around are police checks (which most members
> are against), and having a member sponsor a new applicant (who risks
> their own membership to support them).
> What process does your space use and is it working/failing horribly?
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss