[sudoroom] Meeting Minutes June 28, 2012
Matthew Senate
mattsenate at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 09:11:17 CEST 2012
06/28/2012 - Meeting Notes
*Attendees:*
Ben, Victoria, Max, Eddie, Adam, Troy, Tracy, Eddan, Anthony, Timon, Jenny,
Matt
*Agenda:*
Introductions -
Report-backs -
1) Art Murmur
--Tracy painted the box office room white!
--and spoke with George, who is very supportive of an Art Murmur endeavor
... and also spoke with a Hopi painter who had reserved 2135 Broadway for
Art Murmur (July 7th) and is willing to collaborate!
2) Tech Ops
--Jenny set up two mailing lists at
http://sudoroom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/admin - Sudoroom-announce and
Sudoroom-discuss
Old Business -
* Decision Making Proposal / Draft to be reworked - See Victoria's email.
- *Report-Back from discussion group:*
- Have a proposal, but want to walk through the conversation.
- Talked about what it means to be a group and in a space, we have
shared visions, purposes, outcomes, etc. And with that there are important
things that need to be decided:
- Liability
- Raising Revenue
- Membership
- Want to make sure that structures put in place are "inclusive and
open-ended"
- Do people have more power than others? Or do they have different types
of power?
- Everyone is shy of saying there is "just one process" But instead
decided to narrow down to the most important thing we have right now:
- *Writing our By-Laws.*
- Idea is to propose to this group that we start with what Victoria has
proposed already. Take what Victoria has, take changes and feedback, and
re-present it in one-weeks time for
- *Proposal: to agree to an interim decision-making structure to form
the By-Laws end of July, a more suitable governance structure for some
longer term.*
- Ask for 2/3 majority present at meeting, as well as at 10pm next Weds,
require a simple majority of an online poll following the meeting that will
last until end of Sunday.
- There is one dissenting person from meeting about online voting.
-
- "Vote"
- Minor decenting opinion: Concerned about the danger of making votes
rather than being consensus.
- Minor decenting opinion: Not satisfied with this basic decision
procedure, but faithful that it will be revised in time.
-
Three friendly ammendments:
- Strive for consensus, use a strong recommendation for following
procedure below:
- Make comments in periods for: overall structure and order, paragraph,
phrase level.
- Reiterate anonymous commenting potentials.
- Give longer for online vote.
- Use php polling site.
-
Eddan suggests we split up the editing period into three phases: the first
being major edits, the second being paragraph-style edits, the final being
word changes / minute edits
New Business
* Ways to utilize the website + tools better for what we want to do.
* Intro to wiki, intro to sudo room
* Art Murmur group
- Interest from last week:
- *Sudo Groups*
- 1) Art Murmur Working Group - Tracy, Troy, Erica, Timon
- 2) Tech Stuff Working Group - Eddan, Jenny, Matt
- 3) Finding New Space - Marc, Eddan, Timon, Jenny, Ibrahim, Tracy,
Anthony
- 4) Researching Alternative Membership Modelities - Marina, Jenny, Evan
* Location
Action Item
* Speak with meditation people about further usage of their space.
* Email group everything for decision procedure
* Art Murmur update
* Do a trial Monday night meeting in "classroom"
Victoria wrote a draft decision-making model:
Need: Decision
Step 1: Input
Step 2: Proposal creation (by council?)
Step 3: Present to Group (feedback & amendments)
Step 4: Revision, Vote?
- -by council?
- -consensus of group at large
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/sudoroom/attachments/20120628/83a02014/attachment.html>
More information about the sudoroom
mailing list