[SpaceProgram] Lagrange Solar Sail Challenge
David M.
ainut at hiwaay.net
Thu Oct 4 17:52:14 CEST 2012
Or the gondola could fall down the same rope it went up.
On 10/04/2012 09:53 AM, Lee von Kraus wrote:
> the website says the helikites can go up "thousands" of feet, not sure
> how many thousands though, but I guess at least more than 2000 if
> their using the word correctly.
>
> You're right about all that cable weight weighing things down too
> much. So it might be best to have a space-elevator-like gondola (as
> suggested previously by Matt) thing that can climb up the single rope
> that's anchoring the helikite to the ground. The gondola can be
> powered by a laser from the ground (although I'm not sure how far a
> reasonably sized laser can shoot power). That gondola would drive the
> capsule up to the helikite and then 'throw' the capsule off and let it
> fall to the ground where we could have some sort of cushion to catch
> it. The capsules could have fins on them to better ensure that they
> fall straight down
>
> As the fallen capsule is being retrieved the gondola would already be
> on its way back down to get the same, or another capsule. The system
> wouldn't be too speedy but would still be a useful tool, I'd imagine
> the demand for usage would be pretty high from schools and amateur
> scientists that can't afford other micro-G options.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jerry Isdale <jerry at mauimakers.com
> <mailto:jerry at mauimakers.com>> wrote:
>
> Depending on how high you go and the kg/m mass of the cable, it is
> possible that the weight of the 2x length of cable could be more
> than the weight of the winch.
> using this kevlar rope as a guide...
> http://www.pelicanrope.com/kevlar12strandrope.html
> say we pick the 7/16", 15,000lb tensile strength rope at
> 5lbs/100ft. ('cause thats an easy weight)
> a 1,000ft length will weigh... 50lbs?
>
> 1000 ft will not give much free fall time. Parabolic flights are
> on the order of 8000ft deltas ...400lbs
> Although rolling all that cable up into the helikite would require
> a lot of space/big spool.
>
> Jerry Isdale
> http://MauiMakers.com
> http://www.mauimakers.com/blog/thursday-public-meeting/
>
> On Oct 3, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Lee von Kraus wrote:
>
>> The best way to maximize the allowable experimental capsule
>> weight would be to_have all the motor mechanisms on the ground
>> _as shown in the attached figure. That way the only mechanism,
>> other than the capsule, that needs to be carried by the helikite
>> is a pulley (and the weight of the capsule line).
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Lee von Kraus <leevonk at gmail.com
>> <mailto:leevonk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Here are some useful excerpts:
>> "
>> The 10 cubic metre Skyhook Helikite is able to fly
>> to thousands of feet in winds up to 50 mph lifting a payload
>> of 5kg.
>>
>> Helikites are designed for foul weather deployment and foul
>> weather flight. Even the largest Skyhook Helikites can be
>> launched and retrieved in all the winds that they can fly in.
>> So deployment and flight can occur safely in winds up to 50
>> or 60 mph.
>>
>> The new Cased Helikite Aerostat Maintainable Platform (CHAMP)
>> (see products section) allows the deployment of a 10 cubic
>> metre Skyhook Helikite within 30 minutes. The unique part of
>> the CHAMP is that it also includes an excellent Helibase with
>> top cover thus also creating a permanent, safe base for the
>> Helikite - not just a minimal launch platform.
>>
>> Helikites can even be launched and recovered remotely - with
>> no people present at all. They are simply winched off or onto
>> the Helibase.
>> "
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Lee von Kraus
>> <leevonk at gmail.com <mailto:leevonk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> here is a link better describing the advantages of helikites:
>>
>> http://www.allsopp.co.uk/index.php?mod=page&id_pag=24
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SpaceProgram mailing list
> SpaceProgram at lists.hackerspaces.org
> <mailto:SpaceProgram at lists.hackerspaces.org>
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/spaceprogram
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SpaceProgram mailing list
> SpaceProgram at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/spaceprogram
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/spaceprogram/attachments/20121004/8c57c95d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the SpaceProgram
mailing list