[hs-equality] How to go on

[fabienne]

maha:

mail at martinhaase.de

stephan:

mail at stephanurbach.de

cheers,
fbz

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mitch Altman <maltman23 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't have Maha's email, so I didn't think it OK to add him.  Same goes
> for Stephan.  It's easy enough to add people, and change my submission
> (before the cutoff date, whenever that is).
>
> I'd say the same message as the radio show, and what we've been talking
> about:
> Frank, honest discussion about being queer in the geek community.
> No need to limit the breadth of human emotion.  A mix of heartfelt honesty,
> humor, anger, joy, and whatever else comes up is great.
>
> Asking Andreas to join us would be way cool.
>
> Once we have a wiki we can work out a more specific format so that we can
> fit in what we want for the 40-to-45 minutes (leaving room for Q&A).  We can
> come up with a short list of questions to go over.
>
> We can also start by asking those of us on this list (and then someone who
> knows Maha's email could forward to him) who would like to be on the panel.
> Then we can choose how many and who to be on the panel.  I'll start by
> saying I would.
>
> Mitch.
>
>
> ------------------------
>
>> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 22:07:37 +0200
>> From: fabienne at fabienne.us
>> To: equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> Subject: Re: [hs-equality] How to go on
>>
>> In the same way, why was Maha not on the submitted list for the panel?
>>
>> cheers,
>> fbz
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Tom Lohninger <tom at socialhack.eu> wrote:
>> > Ohai!
>> >
>> > I also want to step in here with a question for clarification.
>> > I honestly don't know what the concept of our talk/workshop should be.
>> > We need to get a framework worked out, because a stage is different then
>> > a radio table.
>> >
>> > I wanted to invite Andreas Bogk to join the discussion, he would be a
>> > big win for us because he is a senior german hacker with transgender aspects
>> > and a brilliant person. But as I tried to write to him what we are up to do
>> > I couldn't explain it neither to myself or to him in a comprehensive way.
>> >
>> > Also I don't understand why Stephan Urbach is not in the submission to
>> > the Pentabarf. He was part of the initial show and keeps thinking and
>> > writing about this in the background. If it is a question of maximum
>> > quantity, I would even be in favor of him instead of me being on this panel.
>> >
>> > I would wish we could all come together and work this out f2f before the
>> > congress and work out something great. It is the right time for this subject
>> > and the positive impact is definitely worthwhile every effort.
>> >
>> > Questions would be:
>> >  - What's the message? What do we want to say?
>> >  - how do we do this, how funny, sad, honest, narrative do we want to
>> > be?
>> >  - Who is best for doing it?
>> >  - What do we leave out (because we can't include everything)? and why?
>> >
>> >
>> > All Best,
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 02.10.2011, at 20:50, Stephan Urbach wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ohai,
>> >>
>> >> I lost my overview of my emails and now I wanted to know how we want to
>> >> proceed. I am a bit lost atm.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Stephan
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Equality mailing list
>> >> Equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> >> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/equality
>> >
>> >
>> > ===============
>> > Thomas Lohninger
>> > thomas at lohninger.org
>> >
>> > twitter: @socialhack
>> > blog: http://socialhack.eu
>> > podcast: http://TalkingAnthropology.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Equality mailing list
>> > Equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/equality
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Equality mailing list
>> Equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/equality
>