[hs-equality] How to go on

[Mitch Altman]

I didn't have Maha's email, so I didn't think it OK to add him.  Same goes for Stephan.  It's easy enough to add people, and change my submission (before the cutoff date, whenever that is). I'd say the same message as the radio show, and what we've been talking about:Frank, honest discussion about being queer in the geek community.  No need to limit the breadth of human emotion.  A mix of heartfelt honesty, humor, anger, joy, and whatever else comes up is great. Asking Andreas to join us would be way cool.
Once we have a wiki we can work out a more specific format so that we can fit in what we want for the 40-to-45 minutes (leaving room for Q&A).  We can come up with a short list of questions to go over. We can also start by asking those of us on this list (and then someone who knows Maha's email could forward to him) who would like to be on the panel.  Then we can choose how many and who to be on the panel.  I'll start by saying I would. Mitch.  ------------------------ > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 22:07:37 +0200
> From: fabienne at fabienne.us
> To: equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
> Subject: Re: [hs-equality] How to go on
> 
> In the same way, why was Maha not on the submitted list for the panel?
> 
> cheers,
> fbz
> 
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Tom Lohninger <tom at socialhack.eu> wrote:
> > Ohai!
> >
> > I also want to step in here with a question for clarification.
> > I honestly don't know what the concept of our talk/workshop should be.
> > We need to get a framework worked out, because a stage is different then a radio table.
> >
> > I wanted to invite Andreas Bogk to join the discussion, he would be a big win for us because he is a senior german hacker with transgender aspects and a brilliant person. But as I tried to write to him what we are up to do I couldn't explain it neither to myself or to him in a comprehensive way.
> >
> > Also I don't understand why Stephan Urbach is not in the submission to the Pentabarf. He was part of the initial show and keeps thinking and writing about this in the background. If it is a question of maximum quantity, I would even be in favor of him instead of me being on this panel.
> >
> > I would wish we could all come together and work this out f2f before the congress and work out something great. It is the right time for this subject and the positive impact is definitely worthwhile every effort.
> >
> > Questions would be:
> >  - What's the message? What do we want to say?
> >  - how do we do this, how funny, sad, honest, narrative do we want to be?
> >  - Who is best for doing it?
> >  - What do we leave out (because we can't include everything)? and why?
> >
> >
> > All Best,
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02.10.2011, at 20:50, Stephan Urbach wrote:
> >
> >> Ohai,
> >>
> >> I lost my overview of my emails and now I wanted to know how we want to proceed. I am a bit lost atm.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Stephan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Equality mailing list
> >> Equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
> >> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/equality
> >
> >
> > ===============
> > Thomas Lohninger
> > thomas at lohninger.org
> >
> > twitter: @socialhack
> > blog: http://socialhack.eu
> > podcast: http://TalkingAnthropology.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Equality mailing list
> > Equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/equality
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Equality mailing list
> Equality at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/equality
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/private/equality/attachments/20111003/7ad1a124/attachment.html>