[hackerspaces] Fwd: Vaping in Spaces?
matt
matt at nycresistor.com
Wed Oct 8 22:12:17 CEST 2014
Uhm... do people allow people into their space who haven't bathed? That
seems insane.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Volatile Compound <
volatilecompound at gmail.com> wrote:
> If we're banning things based on smells, then the only logical thing to
> do is also adopt a policy requiring everyone to take a shower (with
> soap) before coming over to the hackerspace in addition to brushing
> their teeth. Also, no farting in the hackerspace. And for fuck's sake,
> WIPE PROPERLY. It's 102 degrees out there today, but even if it was 40
> below that's still no excuse.
>
> - skroo.
>
> On 10/8/14 12:46 PM, JB Zurn wrote:
> > Note: It simplifies the discussion immensely if we focus on the facts.
> > It smells. Some people are bothered by smells.
> >
> > If I habitually brought my favorite liverwurst and onion sandwiches into
> > the hackerspace, I'd get complaints too.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Matthew McCabe <matt at mrmccabe.com
> > <mailto:matt at mrmccabe.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Warning: trolls ahead, use caution
> >
> > On Oct 8, 2014 11:38 AM, "John Q. Hacker" <dreamingforward at gmail.com
> > <mailto:dreamingforward at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Matthew McCabe
> > <matt at mrmccabe.com <mailto:matt at mrmccabe.com>> wrote:
> > > There is no documented medical evidence showing that vaping
> > leads to any
> > > kind of harm to the person using the vaporizer or people
> > inhaling the vapor
> > > 2nd hand. (If you have some links to peer reviewed medical
> > journals, I
> > > would love to read them.)
> >
> > The speaker above is a Matrix construct for the e-cig industry.
> "No
> > evidence that vaping leads to any kind of harm" is that EXACT
> same
> > argument Philip J. Morris and companies used to get out of any
> > liability of lung cancer for promoting cigarettes ("There is no
> > medical evidence that cigarettes cause lung cancer.").
> >
> > Just in case you missed the fallacy: no evidence against (P ->
> > Q) is
> > not the same as ~Q, given P. Q being some bad consequence of
> > vaping,
> > and P being vaping itself. The rest of his diatribe is purely
> > made to
> > gain your trust ("I have a hackerspace ATX", "Be sure to check
> your
> > local laws", etc.)
> >
> > Logic-is-good, evil is bad. Get clued-in and follow the
> > OneTruePath.
> >
> > Marxos
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> > <mailto:Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org>
> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org <mailto:
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org>
> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20141008/7e7dec9b/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list