[hackerspaces] Communication within the space
Edward L Platt
ed at elplatt.com
Wed Jan 15 23:06:38 CET 2014
Here's an interesting (possibly beta) tool for communication in cooperative
groups by Charlie DeTar: htttp://intertwinkles.org
Charlie's phd thesis contains a really thorough history of technology
that's already been thrown at this problem.
-Ed
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:57 PM, James Arthur <iam at jamesarthur.info> wrote:
> Information Architecture is a hobby of mine I've been exploring. This, in
> my opinion, is one of the single biggest problems in any community oriented
> group.
>
> There are a few criteria to consider in any communication.
>
> *Longevity*: How long should the information last?
>
> - Speaking to someone in person or on the phone expires quickly,
> whereas a book or Wiki may last a lot longer
>
> *Accessibility:* How easy is it to access the information?
>
> - Who can access the information?
> - When is it available?
> - Does it require the ability to read or speak a certain language?
> - Does it require the person to understand certain jargon?
> - Does it require technical savvy to access? [Logging into a site is
> a challenge for some]
>
> *Relative Importance: *How vital is the info?
>
> - How important does the community think this information is?
> - How important does the person receiving the info think it is?
>
> *Method:* There are many but...
>
> - Speaking
> - Texting
> - Calling
> - Emailing
> - Social Media
> - Wiki
> - Website
> - Static [Printed] Signage
> - Dynamic [White board, Electronic] Signage
> - Augmented Reality [Something I think could be very for hacker/maker
> spaces, especially when HUD's become more viable
> - Etc.
>
> Much more to hash out, but I'm a little busy right now. Would love to
> start a side exploratory discussion about this topic with a group of
> interested parties.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Steven Sutton <ssutton4455 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> One of the things that we're discussing a lot at our space is how we keep
>> communication open between members. We have several different tools (wiki,
>> mailing list, weekly meetups, monthly meetings, etc) that each sorta have
>> their own audience.
>>
>> But if we want to get consensus on things like "do we want to be involved
>> in this event" or "how should we invest this money" or "hey, watch out for
>> this in the space" we really aren't reaching the majority of our members
>> because it's being lost in the noise of the other stuff happening on the
>> mailing list.
>>
>> Have any of you tried something different for helping people coordinate
>> with each other that really worked for your space?
>>
>> Steven Sutton
>> President, Freeside Atlanta
>> www.freesideatlanta.org
>> http://www.meetup.com/Freeside-Atlanta/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *James Arthur*
> 857.318.1866
> iam at jamesarthur.info
> www.jamesarthur.info
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
--
Edward L. Platt
http://elplatt.com
http://civic.mit.edu/users/elplatt
http://i3detroit.com
@elplatt <http://twitter.com/elplatt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140115/13b53c49/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list