[hackerspaces] status of this list

[Eric Michaud]

We need guidelines before we vote the person in. Just something to keep in mind.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Böhm <paul at boehm.org>

Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:07:27 
To: Hackerspaces General Discussion List<discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org>
Subject: Re: [hackerspaces] status of this list


ok, and now after matt, bre, and dave from NYCR - any other votes from
nycr before we elect our chieftain^Wmoderator ?

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Dave Giancaspro
<dave.giancaspro at gmail.com> wrote:
>  I think the best way to utilize a moderator would be to handle requests to
> move threads as suggested in Eric's guideline's.  Moderator reviews the
> thread and makes a deciscion and reminds everybody to be excellent to each
> other.  Blatant douche baggery will result in a ban.
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Dave Giancaspro <dave.giancaspro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I have been following the discussion/debate/argument for the past few
>> days.  This has created from my count three threads which have all but taken
>> over the list.  A moderator would help keep this kind of thing to a minimum
>> by actually putting a stop to it before it gets out of hand.
>>
>> I also think Matt would be a good choice due to his involvement and
>> dedication to the community.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Moose D. Hacker - DC718 <moose at dc718.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to second Bre on making Matt Joyce a moderator.  He has the
>>> community's best interests in mind, and is the right person for the job.
>>> On May 14, 2009, at 8:31 PM, bre pettis wrote:
>>>
>>> Please make Matt Joyce a moderator of this group by giving him moderating
>>> privileges. He can do it and do it well.
>>>
>>> Bre
>>>
>>> http://brepettis.com
>>> http://makerbot.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM, <webzeug at gbks.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am Donnerstag 14 Mai 2009 23:15:53 schrieb Tobias Wolter:
>>>> > I still don't see why people can't just ignore senders or threads.
>>>>
>>>> ack.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss