[hackerspaces] Thread which I nominate for death: "Hacking the Spaces: A critical acclaim of what was, is and could be a hackerspace "

[David Powell]

You have my vote. Time for this long pointless discussion to die.

On 5/11/09, druid at stonedcoder.org <druid at stonedcoder.org> wrote:
> I tend to agree with Erics sentiment, useless banter about politics has no
> place in my mailbox either. I like technology, and organizational theory,
> not pissing contests about what hackerspaces are and are not.
>
> I think the original document was presumptious, and assumed authority over
> a topic still developing, where clearly that assumed authority ruffled a
> few feathers.
>
> Second call for thread to die.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Mon, 11 May 2009, Hellekin O. Wolf (/tmp/lab) wrote:
>
>> On Mon 2009-05-11 at 10:33:03 -0700, 3ric Johanson wrote:
>>> While some spaces are highly political, some are anti-political.
>>>
>>> This thread seems to fly in the face of that core difference - - and
>>> from where I sit:
>>>
>>> I will simply un-sub from this list if it's full of banter which does
>>> not enrich my life.
>>>
>> *** With all due respect Eric, why don't you make a mail filter instead of
>> threatening everyone else to unsubscribe from this list?
>>
>> ==
>> hk
>>
>> --
>> |_/H\_|     http://hackerspaces.org/                | |o| |
>> [_xSx_]     irc://irc.freenode.net/hackerspaces     | | |o|
>> ! \O/ !     xmpp:hellekin at hackerspaces.org          |o|o|o|
>> :  :  :
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>