[hackerspaces] Vetting new members

[john arclight]

Our policy is as follows:

Anyone can show up and work or hang out when a keyholder is present. They
can come as often as they like and we even have free cubby holes to store
projects in.  People who use the space in this way are encouraged to donate
something if they can but it's not required.

The keyholders are the actual rent payers.  We charge $200/mo for unlimited
24/7 access and have a small number of these members.  In order to become a
key holder, you need to:

1. Convince us that you can pay in a timely manner.
2. Hang out with us enough times that we know you are responsible and going
to be a good citizen.  We did have to revoke one key in the last 2 years,
but this was because the person went a little nuts on us.

Arclight

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:16 AM, nicolle <superherogirl at gmail.com> wrote:

> At Pumping Station: One, in Chicago, we don't have a formal vetting
> process.  One of our core principles is that anyone aged 18 or older is
> free to become a member of our organization.  Therefore, if someone
> hears about us, comes by, likes what they see, and pays the monthly
> membership fee, they get a key and get 24 hour access to our space.
> (Right now it's physical keys, although we're hoping to implement key
> cards soon.)
>
> We have had a physical space for about two months now, and it's working
> out nicely.  Of course it's a risk to allow such open access to the
> space, but it's a calculated one in my opinion.  Under our model, the
> core benefit of being a member is not just access to the space, but
> twenty-four hour a day, seven day a week access to the space.  There's
> no such thing as a member without a key.  Our space is big enough that
> it can accommodate the number of members who join under our open policy,
> and doing it any other way would violate our intent to involve as many
> new and interesting people in the hackerspace as possible.
>
>
> nicky
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David Powell wrote:
> > We are a new hackerspace in Maryland, USA so we don't have a whole lot
> > of experience. We have discusses this issue and basically it came down
> > to all the existing keyholders must vote in private on weather to
> > allow or deny a member to right to have 24/7 access. With that said we
> > don't actually have a 24/7 facilility available to us yet so we have
> > not given out any keys. When the time comes that we do have 24/7
> > access the board members will have keys and the charter members will
> > also have keys. Currently there are 5 of us putting everything we have
> > into forming our hackerspace. Those 5 will be considered charter
> > members and will ultimately be who gets to decide who else has a key.
> >
> > Not every member needs a key. You need to be careful who you hand them
> > out to. If you have a member who really needs 24/7 access I'm sure
> > they will let you know that they tried to access the building but
> > nobody was there. At that time you could offer to motion for a vote on
> > their behalf amoungst the other keyholders.
> >
> > I would not hand out a key to a new member. We have discussed
> > requiring background checks before providing keys. This is easily done
> > in 5 minutes for free in Maryland using the courts website.
> >
> > One thing you may also want to implement is a quarterly inventory of
> > the keys. Mark each members key with a number and possibly with a do
> > not duplicate message. Then every quarter ask to physically see their
> > key. If they don't have it then it may be time to change the locks.
> >
> > Finally, I've toyed with the idea of not having a key at all. There
> > are plenty of inexpensive electronic locks. This will allow you to
> > keep a log of who accessed the building and when. It would also allow
> > you to setup a system where you can remotely allow a member to enter.
> > So they may not need full access but they may need to call someone and
> > request use of the building before entering.
> >
> > Discuss this over with your members and see what they are comfortable
> with.
> >
> > On 6/17/09, Eric Gerlach <eric+hackerspaces-discuss at gerlach.ca<eric%2Bhackerspaces-discuss at gerlach.ca>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Some of you may have seen me asking this question on IRC over the last
> >> few days, so if you're one of those people, my apologies for the
> >> duplicate communication.  Feel free to respond anyways :-)
> >>
> >> I'm working with a group in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario, Canada to build
> >> a new hackerspace.  One of the debates we're having right now is about
> >> vetting new members.  I'm really interested in what other spaces are
> >> doing.
> >>
> >> Specifically, I'm interested in what a person has to do to become a
> >> member of your organization and get 24/7 access to the space (if you
> >> allow that), and what you feel the advantages and disadvantages to your
> >> approach are.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for your help.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Eric
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> >> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "A developed and decent man cannot be vain without a boundless exactingness
> toward himself and without despising himself at moments to the point of
> hatred."
> Notes from Underground
> by Fyodor Dostoevsky
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20090617/1b640c32/attachment-0001.htm