[sudoroom] Fwd: Loomio - Summary of the last 24 hours
Jehan Tremback
jehan.tremback at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 19:32:06 CET 2012
If the tool automatically signs people up for a list when you only meant to
invite them with a single one time email, then that would be a strike
against it for sure.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Daniel Finlay <somniac at me.com> wrote:
> I may have sent rachel an invite to loomio after creating the Sudoroom
> group. It also seems my 'intro to loomio' was caught in a filter (sent
> from the wrong email), so it may have seemed out of nowhere.
>
> I won't do any inviting again, and I don't think you should mistake my
> actions for Sudoroom policy, except so far as in sudoroom is a do-ocracy
> and this is something that I did.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I was being snarky. The idea is to allow voting by people who are
> not physically present, which has been something that people have wanted
> for a while. The site allows for an easier interface to do so than straight
> email. I'm actually not opposed to only allowing voting by people at the
> meetings.
>
> I am opposed to people objecting to what may be a good solution because it
> is "third party". We do, after all, rent the space from a "third party
> landlord".
>
> Re reading the original email, I am also opposed to people signing people
> up to stuff without their consent. If this is what happened, I apologize
> for my snark. I don't think that we should allow someone committing the
> faux pas of signing other people up for stuff to color our opinion of what
> may or may not be a useful tool.
>
> -Jehan
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:09 AM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:
>
>> only one solution - what is the definition of the problem?
>>
>>
>> Dec 5, 2012 10:05:15 AM, jehan.tremback at gmail.com wrote:
>> Only one solution. Write your own:
>> http://www.twilio.com/blog/2012/09/building-a-real-time-sms-voting-app-part-1-node-js-couchdb.html
>>
>> >Let us know when it 's finished.
>> >
>> >On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, rachel lyra hospodar
>> rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >As a point of data,
>>
>> I would really prefer if my involvement in sudo room did not cause me to
>> be signed up for additional third party software tools and email services
>> without my consent. Further, I don 't think its appropriate for sudo to
>> act this way in general.
>>
>>
>>
>> Otherwise lovin it all,
>> >
>> R.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >From: "Loomio" noreply at loomio.org>
>> >Date: Dec 5, 2012 7:33 AM
>> >Subject: Loomio - Summary of the last 24 hours
>> >
>>
>> To: rachelyra at gmail.com>
>> >
>> >Your Loomio Activity
>> Showing you what’s been happening in your Loomio groups in the last 24
>> hours
>>
>> sudo room
>> Decisions
>>
>>
>> We should have a holiday on the moon!
>> - closes in 1 day
>>
>> >
>> Invite everyone you know from Sudoroom to this group.
>> - closes in 3 days
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>> Unsubscribe or change your email preferences
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >
>> sudoroom mailing list
>> >
>> sudoroom at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> >
>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/sudoroom
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >sudoroom mailing list
>> >sudoroom at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> >http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/sudoroom
>> >
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudoroom mailing list
> sudoroom at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/sudoroom
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/sudoroom/attachments/20121205/f57671ed/attachment.html>
More information about the sudoroom
mailing list