[SpaceProgram] Quick Update on Day 1 of 100YSS Symposium

psytek at alphaonelabs.com psytek at alphaonelabs.com
Sat Sep 15 16:24:32 CEST 2012


Great summary.  Thanks Jerry.

On Sep 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Jerry Isdale <isdale at gmail.com> wrote:

Huei Ming Tan and I are attending the 100Year StarShip Study Symposium in
Houston Tx this weekend.
Yesterday was the first full day ... Thursday there was a 'tour of Johnson
Space Center' activity for early arrivals.  Huei Ming was here and went on
it.  He can give a more full report, but as an indicator of conference
preparation, the folks who went were surprised to learn when they got there
that there was no arranged tour.  Fortunately one of the attendees was from
JPL and became an impromptu tour guide.

Appears to be about 250 registered attendees. Maybe 30 are teams that
proposed for the DARPA RFP (like us).  The conference printed
agenda/materials is another indicator of the organization... It is very
difficult to read and figure out.  The font and spacing is very crammed,
yet most of the page is blank space.  There is little consistency in the
timing layout.  I dont think they have anyone with graphical design
experience on board.  Or at most a 1st year intern.

The Opening Session was a couple Welcome speeches, including a video
recorded welcome from Honorary Chair (former usa) President Bill Clinton.
Mae Jemison, astronaut heading up 100YSS organization gave the long speech
about the org. Lots of 'preaching to the choir' about how great this is and
that they want to be inclusive, etc. Nothing of great news, IMHO.

THen started the 7 parallel tracks of papers and workshops .. 7!! really
hard to choose, except that I was registered for a workshop (Research
Priorities.. RP).  Huei did a papers track.  The workshop (13 people) chose
to frame the discussion around the Socio-Political Environment aspects.  We
were asked to come up with various S/P hypothesis and then broke into small
3-4 person groups to discuss priorities as colored by one or another
hypothesis.  Some of the Hypothesis were: what if research is controlled by
corporate interests?  What if Anti-Science becomes dominant politically?
What if there is a major world war? What if Social Cooperation proves
impractical/impossible on world scale?

My group focused on the Corporate Dominance theme (odd for hacker like me,
but groups were not self-selecting, rather by seats in room).    First
divided research into categories of Propulsion, Habitat, Social and
Destination, and then talked about how Corporations might rank those in
priorities. The personal views of participants showed here - One guy
(corporate) said corporations would totally discount social priorities. I
countered that might not be true as they have a strong interest in
education to insure there are people to hire.  Other social issues (like
how do you keep a society together for duration of interstellar travel)
were completely discounted in corporate priorities (i think they would be
higher but ...)  Propulsion was seen as highest priority.

More details hopefully in the summaries to be given on Sunday. (and when I
have time to write up notes)

Huei Ming and I then attended the Proposers Luncheon, which got us sit-down
meals (vs box lunches for others) and a chance for people to talk quickly
(3min) about their proposal. The moderator was not very good at pulling the
microphone and first couple of people dragged on for 10min.  One guy had a
nuclear propulsion based system that he has been promoting since 1961
(tried for patents but denied, etc) and ran on and on about it for a while.
 They nearly cut off the last 3 groups - including us.   Huei did talk and
turns out there are a couple other very interesting related groups here
with whom we have connected (more later).

I went to a papers session in later afternoon, and Joe Ritter of the Open
Source Space Alliance (and one of the track chair's) gave me 10min of his
presentation (last of day) to talk about SpaceGAMBIT.  Lot of people were
excited by it  and one former LLNL scientist came up afterwards to say he
was about to give up on conference until he heard last couple of talks
including ours.  Now he has some hope for effort.

Overall there has been little about the 100YSS organization itself here.
 What is there corporate org, plans, research done, etc.  It seems that
they are  using the seed $$ to set up a group that will then do fundraising
and after that maybe do some research support.

(I skipped out on the extra cost dinner/reception last night and went to a
blues club with a friend who lives here in Houston. ... wound up talking
till 2am)

Lots of interesting people, from hard science, social angles, and some
lunatic fringe too... I'm probably in the latter group - Hackerspaces in
Space? Are you Crazy? .... yes.

Jerry Isdale
isdale at spacegambit.org
USA Program Lead, SpaceGAMBIT
Global Alliance of Makers Building Interstellar Technology
http://SpaceGAMBIT.org

This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of
the human(s) named above. If intercepted by an extraterrestrial
civilization, all opinions expressed in this email are my own and do not
necessarily reflect the opinion of mankind as a whole.






_______________________________________________
SpaceProgram mailing list
SpaceProgram at lists.hackerspaces.org
http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/spaceprogram
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/spaceprogram/attachments/20120915/bf27a740/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the SpaceProgram mailing list