[hackerspaces] a study of governance

Xer0Dynamite dreamingforward at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 01:31:08 CEST 2016


Yes, that is my ultimate conclusion and I have made a game to combine
both:  the Pangaia World Game (aka Hacker World Domination).  See
<http://wiki.hackerspaces.org/HackerWorldDomination>.

It is a self-organizing system that combines both virtues into one
single system.

For the documents that started this thread, see
<http://wiki.hackerspaces.org/Governance>.

Mark

On 8/15/16, Edward L Platt <ed at elplatt.com> wrote:
> The book "Reinventing Organizations" has some excellent case studies of
> organizations that fit into a third, self-managed category:
> http://www.reinventingorganizations.com/ -Ed
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Xer0Dynamite <dreamingforward at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In the cornucopia of hackerspaces, two organizational structures seem
>> to stand the test of time:  '''do-ocracy''' and '''bureaucracy'''.
>>
>> They represent two competing ideals.  Do-ocracy is a vertical axis of
>> individualism and bureaucracy is a horizontal axis of collective
>> action.  Economically, the comparison would be like capitalism vs.
>> socialism.
>>
>> The success of do-ocracy is that you can just get things done -- if
>> you ''already have the will for it''.
>> The success of bureaucracy is that everyone is empowered -- when there
>> are resources to do them.
>>
>> The weakness of do-ocracies is that since there is no pre-planning,
>> things you need ''aren't there''.  It gets there ''after'' a failure
>> occurs and ''if'' the individual acts on it.
>> The weakness of bureaucracy is that things happen s-l-o-w-l-y because
>> it's difficult to reach consensus and people burn out.
>>
>> Most hackerspaces are not quite at these extremes as do-ocracies
>> implement weekly meetings, for example, for collective discussion, and
>> bureaucracies generally allow individual action when it doesn't
>> adversely affect anyone else or affect safety.
>>
>> Most adhocracies seem to die out through lack of leadership,
>> participation, and entropy.
>>
>> Here endeth the lesson.
>>
>> \0x
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Edward L. Platt
> PhD student, University of Michigan School of Information
> https://elplatt.com
> @elplatt <http://twitter.com/elplatt>
> KC1DYK
>
> Tips for stopping email overload:
> https://hbr.org/2012/02/stop-email-overload-1
>
> This digital electronic mail message was sent from my general-purpose
> desktop personal computing machine.  Please forgive any overly-verbose,
> long-winded, rambling prose.
>


More information about the Discuss mailing list