[hackerspaces] Failing/failed hackerspaces

Joshua Pritt ramgarden at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 22:05:48 CEST 2014 

One of the things we're working on now at the brand new (as of November
2013) Melbourne Makerspace in Florida is getting a set of volunteer
positions created like Treasurer, Facilities Director, etc. so we can do
things like report on our financials to all the members instead of it being
only known to the original board members who have their name on the
building lease and other paperwork.  So we can make better financial
decisions as a group to keep the space running great!  So I can see not
having the right set of people helping out on all the major workings of the
space would cause one person to get burned out and quit or not do a very
good job in that position?  Unless they are really motivated and love the
space and never get burned out or bored like a lot of us!  Pretty much
doing anything that would cause the number of members to drop so low there
isn't enough income to pay the rent/bills would be a very good place to
start.  Make sure you're listening to the "heartbeat" of the entire
membership either through the mailing list or comment box or whatever so
that the space can grow and new members can be added as much as possible!


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Crawford Comeaux <crawford.comeaux at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Both are examples of what I'd like to hear about (especially if there's a
> happy ending to the story that includes how things were turned around).
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Sung won Lim <4phlebas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well there could be something like a completely corrupt and abusive
>> hackerspace that earns enough money to keep the doors open. You could
>> always get unpaid interns make things and then sell them/offer the process
>> as classes without crediting them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Randall G. Arnold <
>> randall.arnold at texrat.net> wrote:
>>
>>>   Yeah, it's really easy to spawn tangents on this topic.  ;)
>>>  If a space fails to appeal to visitors, yet is still successful for the
>>> regulars, then I guess it loses its designation as An Official Tourist
>>> Attraction.  More beer for the locals.
>>>
>>>  Seriously: if you're pleasing your target audience, yet irritating
>>> people you didn't target (even inadvertantly), I fail to see a problem...
>>> unless said outreach was part of the mission.  But even then, not a failure
>>> unless the administration fails to investigate and address.  Just an
>>> opportunity (sorry, old corporate habit).
>>>
>>>  And if pleasing visitors is ouside the mission, or is seen as obviously
>>> more work than it's worth, then no real issue.  Also still more beer.
>>>
>>>
>>> On April 4, 2014 at 2:41 PM Crawford Comeaux <crawford.comeaux at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  What about failing to be fun/appealing to visitors from other spaces?
>>> Disregard if that also leads to hair-splitting ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Randall G. Arnold <
>>> randall.arnold at texrat.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>   That's another question that requires context.  I doubt the locals
>>> would see it as failing, even as global community might.  And not to
>>> nitpick, but failing what?  I agree with Mark: if it's open it's certainly
>>> not an operational failure... but I can see where some might see
>>> *philosophical* failure if it didn't meet certain conventions.  And even
>>> THAT starts up the usual hair-splitting...
>>>
>>>  It's Friday.  No hair-splitting for me.  ;)
>>>
>>>  Randy
>>>  Tarrant Makers
>>>
>>>
>>> On April 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM Crawford Comeaux <
>>> crawford.comeaux at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Would a failing space be one that may be locally successful, but viewed
>>> negatively in the global hackerspace community?
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Mark Henderson <mhenderson683 at live.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>  I define a failed space as one who's no longer in business.  Doors
>>> closed, memberships cancelled, 100% out of business.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:50:39 -0400
>>> From: 4phlebas at gmail.com
>>> To: discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> Subject: Re: [hackerspaces] Failing/failed hackerspaces
>>>
>>>
>>>  Define failed hackerspace- if a nasty space keeps on chugging along
>>> through geographical/media clout despite severe issues, is it a successful
>>> space?
>>>
>>>  -sung
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Jesse Krembs <jessekrembs at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hey Matt
>>>
>>>  I would argue that neither the HHH or the L0pht are good examples of
>>> failed spaces.
>>>  The HHH was a residence first in my view and just happened to be
>>> populated by hackertypes.
>>>  The L0pht predates the modern hackerspaces era, was private and was a
>>> unique beast, also it  didn't so much as get bought by corporate interests
>>> and sold out to (or bought in).
>>>
>>>  3rd Ward might be better example. (makerspace).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:35 PM, matt <matt at nycresistor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>   > 1.  What are some well known failed spaces to the discussion group,
>>> and
>>> > what caused them to fail?
>>>
>>>  HHH ( all the things ), L0pht ( purchased by corporate interest ),
>>> Countless tiny unheard of spaces.
>>>
>>>   > 2.  Are there any spaces that are "too big to fail", i.e. too much
>>> money is
>>> > invested in the space - so much so that it has become a disservice to
>>> the
>>> > community instead of an asset?  What are some of the common mistakes
>>> > that spaces make that keep them from growing or succeeding?
>>>
>>>   Noisebridge.
>>>
>>>  I'd ask you this.  Is growth success?  Start with what your own metric
>>> for success is.  If you are just building a physical edifice to your own
>>> interest, you've probably already failed.  If you are trying to start a
>>> movement to support a crusade... again you've failed.  If you are just
>>> trying to find a group of people you want to hack with... then all you need
>>> is enough people to be happy and survive.  What keeps people from success
>>> generally, is failing to identify what their metric for success is.  Or
>>> trying to do too many things.  You can't be all things to all people.  The
>>> other big one is believing there is a community to support your goals when
>>> sometimes there just isn't.  And the last and worst... thinking you can
>>> turn running a hackerspace into a career.
>>>
>>>  > 3.  Has anyone taken failed models and used them as sort of a "this
>>> is what
>>> > not to do" list?  Where could I source that info?
>>>
>>> http://hackerspaces.org/images/8/8e/Hacker-Space-Design-Patterns.pdf
>>>
>>>   > 4.  For people new to this industry, what are some of the common
>>> > newcomer mistakes in starting up a makerspace/hackerspace that you
>>> would
>>> > have liked to been made aware of so you could have avoided them and
>>> > saved yourself a massive headache?
>>>  Trust every member of your space as if they had keys to your home.  If
>>> you can't do that, you've already failed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Mark Henderson <
>>> mhenderson683 at live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>    I have some questions about failed or failing hackerspaces and
>>> makerspaces.
>>>
>>> 1.  What are some well known failed spaces to the discussion group, and
>>> what caused them to fail?
>>>
>>>  2.  Are there any spaces that are "too big to fail", i.e. too much
>>> money is invested in the space - so much so that it has become a disservice
>>> to the community instead of an asset?  What are some of the common mistakes
>>> that spaces make that keep them from growing or succeeding?
>>>
>>>  3.  Has anyone taken failed models and used them as sort of a "this is
>>> what not to do" list?  Where could I source that info?
>>>
>>>  4.  For people new to this industry, what are some of the common
>>> newcomer mistakes in starting up a makerspace/hackerspace that you would
>>> have liked to been made aware of so you could have avoided them and saved
>>> yourself a massive headache?
>>>
>>>  Thanks!
>>>
>>> Mark Henderson
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Jesse Krembs
>>> 802.233.7051
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140404/490a49a1/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Discuss mailing list