[hackerspaces] are we creating a political discussion list?

[Jaromil]

On Wed, 07 Dec 2011, Yves Quemener wrote:

> On 12/07/2011 05:59 PM, Psy Tek wrote:

> > The majority of people who voted want to keep the politics on this
> > list.
> > 
> > http://www.doodle.com/sckea2pui97mzmxk
> 
> Considering I erased names like icanvoteasceondtime, athird,
> wecancheat, fifthvoteforme, maybe my idea was far from a good one.

this discussion about moving talks on another list comes back now and
then... honestly I find it ridicolous that people cannot ignore what
they aren't interested. What's the issue really here?

everything has a political meaning, even saying that no political
discussions are to be held on a list is a deeply political statement.

however, for the record, I'd be against talking about parliamentary
polititics and "political parties", which would be propaganda. but I
don't see this flaw in the discussion.

so thanks for your patience, vote to keep.. and filtering abilities!
(and thanks Mitch for your great prose!)

ciao


-- 
jaromil,  dyne.org developer,  http://jaromil.dyne.org
GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1530 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20111209/7fe6d6cd/attachment.pgp>