[hackerspaces] status of this list

[Matt Joyce]

Why don't we just discuss what we WANT moderated if anything.  A code of
conduct?  Something?

What is defined as the rules of behavior on the list?

Webmind for instance thinks all we need is a list of rules by which to
follow and that we will follow them if we know what they are.  If we can get
our heads together, and define some rules of conduct on the list.  We may
not even need a moderator.

Can we continue that discussion?

-Matt

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Paul Böhm <paul at boehm.org> wrote:

> ok, and now after matt, bre, and dave from NYCR - any other votes from
> nycr before we elect our chieftain^Wmoderator ?
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Dave Giancaspro
> <dave.giancaspro at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  I think the best way to utilize a moderator would be to handle requests
> to
> > move threads as suggested in Eric's guideline's.  Moderator reviews the
> > thread and makes a deciscion and reminds everybody to be excellent to
> each
> > other.  Blatant douche baggery will result in a ban.
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Dave Giancaspro <
> dave.giancaspro at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have been following the discussion/debate/argument for the past few
> >> days.  This has created from my count three threads which have all but
> taken
> >> over the list.  A moderator would help keep this kind of thing to a
> minimum
> >> by actually putting a stop to it before it gets out of hand.
> >>
> >> I also think Matt would be a good choice due to his involvement and
> >> dedication to the community.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Moose D. Hacker - DC718 <
> moose at dc718.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I would like to second Bre on making Matt Joyce a moderator.  He has
> the
> >>> community's best interests in mind, and is the right person for the
> job.
> >>> On May 14, 2009, at 8:31 PM, bre pettis wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please make Matt Joyce a moderator of this group by giving him
> moderating
> >>> privileges. He can do it and do it well.
> >>>
> >>> Bre
> >>>
> >>> http://brepettis.com
> >>> http://makerbot.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM, <webzeug at gbks.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Am Donnerstag 14 Mai 2009 23:15:53 schrieb Tobias Wolter:
> >>>> > I still don't see why people can't just ignore senders or threads.
> >>>>
> >>>> ack.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Discuss mailing list
> >>>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> >>>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Discuss mailing list
> >>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> >>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Discuss mailing list
> >>> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> >>> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> > http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.hackerspaces.org
> http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hackerspaces.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20090514/05876d1b/attachment-0001.htm