[Spaceapi-devel] status field in 0.13

[Eric Stein]

Why are we making backward incompatible changes again?

I say, beating my trusty dead horse.

Eric

On 02/25/2013 10:58 PM, Roland Hieber wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just tried to implement the 0.13 RC, but I found conflicting
> requirements about the "status" field.
>
> http://openspace.slopjong.de/specs/0.13 says, the field should be an
> object containing the properties "open" and an "icon" array
>
> http://hackerspaces.nl/spaceapi/ (and the GitHub repo) says, it should
> be a text field.
>
> So, which of these pages is outdated? :-)
>
> As a side note, if we make the "status" field an array, we would break
> backward compatibility. So I rather name it "state" instead.
>