<html><head><style type="text/css">body {word-wrap: break-word; background-color:#ffffff;}</style></head><body><div style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px"><font face="monospace">First off, thanks for all the expert replies.<br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace">I did a little looking at everything and on my own. I have used engenius products with amazing success which prompts me to buy the engenius </font><font face="monospace">ECB9500 ap.<br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace">Any yes/no/good/bad on that device?<br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace">I also have a linksys WRE54G v3 which I never seemed to get working with my current linksys WAP54G (which sucks for range).<br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace">Any advice on the new AP would be great.<br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace">.270</font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font><font face="monospace"><br></font></div>-----Original message-----<br><blockquote style="; border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px"><b>From: </b>Paul Timmins <paul@timmins.net><b><br>To: </b>pen@lists.hackerspaces.org<b><br>Sent: </b>Sat, Jan 21, 2012 00:43:48 GMT+00:00<b><br>Subject: </b>Re: [Pen] New AP needed<br><br></div>On a serious note, I think the reason they don't get the logo is that <br>the bullet and friends can do things like adjust channel bandwidth, can <br>perform channel shifting (channel 10.5 anyone?), and it's my guess that <br>these things make the device non-compliant and thus don't pass <br>certification.<br><br>-Paul<br><br>On 01/20/2012 07:39 PM, Paul Timmins wrote:<br>> airmax for bullet<br>> T D M A contention<br>> it is optional<br>><br>> brad and i haz link<br>> over quarter mile 10 meg<br>> yay 2MHP<br>><br>><br>><br>> On 01/19/2012 11:24 AM, Toby wrote:<br>>> I looked back at their products. They are very careful not to mention<br>>> 802.11N or have the certified logo anywhere on their products, except<br>>> on some indoor AP gear. I'm guessing that due to their departure<br>>> ("improvements?") compared to the spec they cannot or do not desire to<br>>> get certified.<br>>><br>>> M in their lineup evidently stands for airMax not MIMO since at least<br>>> for the Bullet there can be only one antenna.<br>>><br>>> Is there anything that has to be done to these to be compatible with<br>>> regular N devices, or is the airmax feature set just a compatible<br>>> super/subset?<br>>><br>>> - Strydre<br>>><br>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Myself<leadacid@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>>>> N-capable gear<br>>>> By Ubiquiti is called<br>>>> "M" series, for MIMO<br>>>><br>>>> Also, that chipset<br>>>> has spectrum analysis<br>>>> built in, called AirView<br>>>><br>>>> Can haz Nano-M<br>>>> You will not be disappoint<br>>>> Signal all the things!<br>>>><br>>>> -Myself-<br>>>><br>>>>> From: darthstrydre@gmail.com<br>>>>> +1 for the ubiquiti bullet, but it is single antenna and has no N<br>>>>><br>>>>> The only N products I can find for them are the Unifi line of APs,<br>>>>> which are only 2.4GHz N, at 70 and 80$ for the regular and long range<br>>>>> ones.<br>>>><br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> Pen mailing list<br>>>> Pen@lists.hackerspaces.org<br>>>> <a href="http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen">http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen</a><br>>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> Pen mailing list<br>>> Pen@lists.hackerspaces.org<br>>> <a href="http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen">http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen</a><br>>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Pen mailing list<br>> Pen@lists.hackerspaces.org<br>> <a href="http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen">http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen</a><br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Pen mailing list<br>Pen@lists.hackerspaces.org<br><a href="http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen">http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/pen</a><br></blockquote></body></html>