<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Good morning.<br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">Life
on Earth is threatened by our conservatism and fake
<br>
<br>
evolution.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Totally true.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">Engines,
Electricity, Rockets, 3D-Printers, Chipsets,
<br>
<br>
Crypto-Currencies, HTTPS, are not the solutions to save us.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Strange mix there, I don't see your point, those are wildly
different topics.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">1/
Internet has to be distributed over the entire planet
<br>
<br>
(almost there!) BUT free access is mandatory.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether we like it or not, maintaining this giant infrastructure
has a lot of costs associated, so we are not going to get truly
"free" access any time soon. Public libraries who have computers
available, or free municipal wifi are the closest we are going to
be to "free" during a long time.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">2/
One connected computer per city or village should
<br>
<br>
be enough.
<br>
<br>
The method to power it will depend on context.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>That doesn't make any sense. Who decides how it's used, or who
has access to it? It's true that we have a problem with the
excessive production of everything, including computers, and its
associated contamination, but moving to the opposite extrem is not
the solution to anything. Also, this whould supress the
decentralized nature of the Internet, one of it's main strenghts.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">The
method to connect it to Internet should be fast
<br>
<br>
and resiliant to heavy meteor showers and any
<br>
<br>
Natural disaster as Nuclear bombs.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>"Nuclear bombs" are not natural disasters, and meteor showers are
innofensive.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">3/
Voting for IDEAS should be chosen over voting for
<br>
<br>
people, even randomly chosen.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't see this solving anything, as manipulation/propaganda is
already being used to promote ideas instead of people.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">4/
Each agreed IDEA should be applied or taken for True.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Nothing is really "true", any idea can be proven false or
dangerous in any given time, so whathever system we have of
governance, it has to be flexible enough to accomodate this
possibility.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7672470d-5738-1d2a-c585-cd87ba786f50@massmulti.org">5/
HTTPS and any encryption is useless in times of
<br>
<br>
total peace.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Never going to happen, but even if this theoretical "total peace"
is achieved, I still want my communications secured, because
accidents happen. Like a seatbelt in cars, but for communications.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Best regards.<br>
Enrique<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>