<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<pre wrap="">Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 60949 bytes with a limit of 40 KB</pre>
<br>
grrrr. MLs suck!<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/02/15 17:23, peter wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:54EE04FD.9040602@riseup.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/02/15 14:42, Bacon Zombie
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPz7E52JCyaDFK2ZKu2=DAKdSHX-twun6R1mkX_z-wxF1eOV=A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">But can a banned member call an EGM?</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes. Any member can call an EGM if they have support of 5% of the
membershit.<br>
<br>
The directors are now going through the process of removing me as
a member.<br>
<br>
This is interesting, because I don't think they bothered to do
this with the other people that were banned.<br>
<br>
To remove a member requires giving them 21 days notice, and
allowing them (or a representative) to attend the meeting about
their removal.<br>
<br>
What do they have to gain from removing me as a member?<br>
<br>
They don't need to do that to ban me from the physical space or
online communications, they've already done that.<br>
<br>
So it seems like the ONLY reason they have for bothering to go
through the process of removing me is to give me less time to get
support for the EGM.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPz7E52JCyaDFK2ZKu2=DAKdSHX-twun6R1mkX_z-wxF1eOV=A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 25 Feb 2015 07:56, "David Cake" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:dave@difference.com.au">dave@difference.com.au</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">If there is a documented
grievance procedure that has been agreed on by the
membership, and the leadership followed it, then they have
done the right thing. It may well be that some people
have, in the course of that, behaved in ways you disagree
with, or made judgements you disagree with, but that can
happen in a well run organisation for a variety of
reasons. Not everyone has the same views, or wishes to run
a shared space the same way. Barring higher level
legislation, if a majority of people sufficiently
disagrees with you about what is socially acceptable and
the rules are being followed, you should abide by it or
leave the joint space.
<div><br>
<div>The only remaining option is an EGM or a motion at
an AGM.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>David</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>