<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
I see it very basically:<br>
In a makerspace, you make new stuff from raw materials (design PCB,
write softs, build machines...)<br>
In a hackerspace, you hack different functionality into existing
stuff (radio-toaster, CDrom robot ...)<br>
<br>
But also, in a hackerspace you can as well make new stuff from raw
and in a makerspace you can recycle old materials.<br>
So the origin is different, the result is quite the same:
creativity.<br>
<br>
Georges<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/03/2013 11:41 AM, Frantisek
Apfelbeck wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1357209669.26911.YahooMailNeo@web112408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:bookman
old style, new york, times, serif;font-size:10pt">
<div><span>Hi to all,</span></div>
<div><span>I remember discussions some year or more ago which
were trying to "clear up" the difference between
hackerspaces and makerspaces - when the "shift" started to
happen (if not before). If I remember correctly most of the
opinions were that the differences are in the amount of
hardware hacking in makerspaces and more software hacking in
hackerspaces. For me it sounds bit strange because many of
either off do both and also the ratio changes with time and
peopl involved. I do not remember references to makerspaces
as being for profit. Is it now the case by definition? I
still take makerspace = hackerspace.</span></div>
<div><span></span> </div>
<div><span>I wonder if it is just me or if the
makerspace/hackerspace communities are still virtually the
same. </span></div>
<div><span></span>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>