<br clear="all">Digitally signing that content would not be a bad idea for those messages.... but which key to trust?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Koen Martens <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gmc@sonologic.nl">gmc@sonologic.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:25:28PM +0100, Caspar Clemens Mierau wrote:<br>
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Koen Martens wrote:<br>
> > Pardon my paranoia, but what prove do i have that this is indeed<br>
> > wikileaks asking me to put their pubkey in a server, and not some evil<br>
> > genius building a botnet of willing victims??<br>
><br>
> You cannot prove that. But nobody asked for a ssh root access. Just<br>
> provide a locked down ftp or stripped ssh account and everything is<br>
> fine.<br>
<br>
</div>That I would do anyway, it just strikes me as an odd way of doing things,<br>
even more so because there are also url's circulating with the same<br>
instructions on public pastebin's that can be modified by anyone.<br>
<br>
Gr,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Koen<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.hackerspaces.org">Discuss@lists.hackerspaces.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.hackerspaces.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>